---

In the 1980s, Genichi Taguchi, a Japanese quality advisor, claimed that most of the variability affiliated with the response could be attributed to the company of unmanageable (noise) factors. In some practical cases, his modeling proposition evidence leads the quality improvement to many runs in a crossed array. Hence, several researchers have em-braced noteworthy attitudes of response surface methodology along with the robust parameter design action as alternatives to Taguchi's plan. These alternatives model the response's mean and variance corresponding to the combination of control and noise factors in a combined array to accomplish a robust process or production. Indeed, using response surface methods to the robust parameter design minimises the impression of noise factors on assembling processes or productions. This paper intends to develop further modeling of the predicted response and variance in the presence of noise factors based on unbiased and robust estimators. Another goal is to design the experiments according to the optimal designs to improve these estimators' accuracy and precision simultaneously.

---

In statistical research, experimental designs are used to investigate the effect of control variables on output responses. These methods are based on the assumption of normal distribution of data and face fundamental challenges in dealing with outliers. The present study examines five different examples of experimental design methods to deal with this challenge: Huber, quadratic, substitution, ranking, and fuzzy regression robustness methods. By providing empirical evidence from real data on seedling growth and weld quality, it is shown that fuzzy can be used as an efficient alternative to conventional methods in the presence of outliers. It is shown that fuzzy not only outperforms the classical experimental design method in the presence of outliers, but also outperforms standard robustness methods in handling outliers.