[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Ethics Considerations::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Indexing and Abstracting



 
..
Social Media

..
Licenses
Creative Commons License
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0
International License
(CC BY-NC 4.0).
 
..
Similarity Check Systems


..
:: Search published articles ::
Showing 1 results for Nicknam

Zahra Nicknam, Rahim Chinipardaz,
Volume 19, Issue 1 (9-2025)
Abstract

Classical hypothesis tests for the parameters provide suitable tests when the hypotheses are not restricted. The best are the uniformly most powerful test and the uniformly most powerful unbiased test. These tests are designed for specific hypotheses, such as one-sided and two-sided for the parameter. However, in practice, we may encounter hypotheses that the parameters under test have typical restrictions in the null or alternative hypothesis. Such hypotheses are not included in the framework of classical hypothesis testing. Therefore, statisticians are looking for more powerful tests than the most powerful ones. In this article, the union-intersection test for the sign test of variances in several normal distributions is proposed and compared with the likelihood ratio test. Although the union-intersection test is more powerful, neither test is unbiased. Two rectangular and smoothed tests have been examined for a more powerful test.

Page 1 from 1     

مجله علوم آماری – نشریه علمی پژوهشی انجمن آمار ایران Journal of Statistical Sciences

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 33 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710