---

The prevalence of Covid-19 is greatly affected by the location of the patients. From the beginning of the pandemic, many models have been used to analyze the survival time of  Covid-19 patients. These models often use the Gaussian random field to include this effect in the survival model. But the assumption of Gaussian random effects is not realistic. In this paper, by considering a spatial skew Gaussian random field for random effects and a new spatial survival model is introduced. Then, in a simulation study, the performance of the proposed model is evaluated.  Finally, the application of the model to analyze the survival time data of Covid-19 patients in Tehran is presented.

---

In some instances, the occurrence of an event can be influenced by its spatial location, giving rise to spatial survival data. The accurate and precise estimation of parameters in a spatial survival model poses a challenge due to the complexity of the likelihood function, highlighting the significance of employing a Bayesian approach in survival analysis. In a Bayesian spatial survival model, the spatial correlation between event times is elucidated using a geostatistical model. This article presents a simulation study to estimate the parameters of classical and spatial survival models, evaluating the performance of each model in fitting simulated survival data. Ultimately, it is demonstrated that the spatial survival model exhibits superior efficacy in analyzing blood cancer data compared to conventional models.

---

Due to the volume and complexity of emerging data in survival analysis, it is necessary to use statistical learning methods in this field. These methods can estimate the probability of survival and the effect of various factors on the survival of patients. In this article, the performance of the Cox model as a common model in survival analysis is compared with compensation-based methods such as Cox Ridge and Cox Lasso, as well as statistical learning methods such as random survival forests and neural networks. The simulation results show that in linear conditions, the performance of the models mentioned above is similar to the Cox model. In non-linear conditions, methods such as Cox lasso, random survival forest, and neural networks perform better. Then, these models were evaluated in the analysis of the data of patients with atheromatous, and the results showed that when faced with data with a large number of explanatory variables, statistical learning approaches generally perform better than the classical survival model.